MachineMachine /stream - tagged with past https://machinemachine.net/stream/feed en-us http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss LifePress therourke@gmail.com <![CDATA[Singularities panel, Transmediale (5th Feb 2017)]]> http://additivism.org/post/157310071576

Singularities panel, Transmediale (5th Feb 2017)The video of our #Singularities panel at Transmediale is now online:Featuring the extraordinary talents of Luiza Prado & Pedro Oliveira (A parede), Rasheedah Phillips, and Dorothy R. Santos speaking (and performing) on refiguring techno-colonialist and heteronormative pasts, presents, futures and identities.The introduction to the panel - written by Morehshin and myself - can be found here. Photos from the panel are here.Stick around for the discussion and Q&A

]]>
Thu, 16 Feb 2017 02:02:15 -0800 http://additivism.org/post/157310071576
<![CDATA[Borges and Memory: Encounters with the Human Brain]]> http://bit.ly/UoXFIT

What is the genesis of Funes the Memorious, the Jorge Luis Borges story about a mnemonist that fascinates neuroscientists, and is as famed a fictional treatise on memory as anything but Proust’s Remembrance of Things Past?

]]>
Sun, 11 Nov 2012 21:23:00 -0800 http://bit.ly/UoXFIT
<![CDATA[From Eternity to Here]]> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703436504574640151374207392.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_TOPRightCarousel

The arrow of time points in one direction only, from past to present to future. Now there's a fact—rather like Wittgenstein's observation "A is the same thing as A"—that is so patently obvious as to be unworthy of remark. But ask a theoretical physicist just how obvious that fact really is and you will soon discover that it is not obvious at all. Indeed the "arrow of time" presents one of the greatest mysteries known to modern science. Why so? Well, for a start, no one can agree on what precisely is meant by "past," "present" and "future." As for an agreed definition of "time" itself, we are as far as we have ever been from achieving that.

]]>
Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:15:00 -0800 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703436504574640151374207392.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_TOPRightCarousel