MachineMachine /stream - tagged with sense https://machinemachine.net/stream/feed en-us http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss LifePress therourke@gmail.com <![CDATA['Zones' in science and weird fiction]]> http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/300735

Looking for examples of science/weird fictions that deal with 'zones': intermediate or parallel realms - often forbidden - beyond the normal sphere of law or reason. ...of course there's 'Stalker' or 'Roadside Picnic' & echoes in the 2010 film 'Monsters' and Jeff VanderMeer's recent 'Southern Reach' series. I'm thinking of Samuel Delaney's concept of the 'paraspace' too, though these are always accessed through some technological prosthesis.

Any other ZONES?

]]>
Wed, 21 Sep 2016 06:22:20 -0700 http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/300735
<![CDATA[Radical Ethology: Jussi Parikka's Insect Media]]> http://rhizome.org/editorial/2011/apr/20/radical-ethology-jussi-parikkas-insect-media/

In a fundamental sense, technology is deeply non-human. While we might apply a humanist logic to the function and workings of technological systems, and view technological objects as extensions of the human body and its capacity for adaptive prosthesis, the very purpose of technology is to be that which the human is not or to achieve that which the human could not otherwise do. As such, technology exists beyond the humanist understanding of the individual, the body, and the subject, particularly in contemporary network culture in which technology is in part transformed from concrete and material objects into molecular, adaptive, and often invisible systems. Much as with the animal world, technology seems to suggest a mode of communication and media beyond that of human language, a mode of being or becoming that exceeds our own.

]]>
Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:25:08 -0700 http://rhizome.org/editorial/2011/apr/20/radical-ethology-jussi-parikkas-insect-media/
<![CDATA[DJO - Online Swimming]]> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGDuhSHzPyE&feature=youtube_gdata ]]> Sat, 27 Mar 2010 04:04:00 -0700 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGDuhSHzPyE&feature=youtube_gdata <![CDATA[Adorno on Mimesis in Aesthetic Theory]]> http://www.wbenjamin.org/mimesis.html

Art is imitation only to the extent to which it is objective expression, far removed from psychology. There may have been a time long ago when this expressive quality of the objective world generally was perceived by the human sensory apparatus. It no longer is. Expression nowadays lives on only in art. Through expression art can keep at a distance the moment of being-for-other which is always threatening to engulf it. Art is thus able to speak in itself. This is the realization through mimesis. Art's expression is the antithesis of 'expressing something.' Mimesis is the ideal of art, not some practical method or subjective attitude aimed at expressive values. What the artist contributes to expression is his ability to mimic, which sets free in him the expressed substance." [1]

Adorno's critique of mimesis proposes a method of dialectical reflection which goes against the grain of the positivistic tendency of modern consciousness, which has a tendency to substitute means for ends. "Ar

]]>
Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:19:00 -0700 http://www.wbenjamin.org/mimesis.html